|
Resumé
| The aim of this article is to compare the different artificial intelligence systems currently used in the justice system, both predictive and decision-making systems. In this context, I will focus on the benefits as well as the risks that the use of AI in the justice sector entails. Here, I am referring in particular to the disadvantages and risks of artificial intelligence in the form of an insufficiently representative set of input data and the associated bias in decision-making or prediction, balanced, on the other hand, by the speed and accuracy of these systems. In the article I also discuss the obstacles to the introduction of artificial intelligence decision-making systems into the European, and hence Czech, judicial space, where their use is hindered by the Constitution of the Czech Republic and the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, as well as the Criminal Code. Restrictions on the introduction of autonomous decision-making systems also exist at the EU level. The use of artificial intelligence in the Czech and European context thus remains mainly in the role of electronic assistants.. |
Plný text